PROJECT STAGE 3 - Understanding GCC Garbage Collection Test Cases in gcc.dg

Introduction

Briefly introduce the significance of garbage collection in compilers and its role in ensuring memory efficiency and correctness in generated code.

Overview of Test Cases

Provide an overview of the test cases found in the gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg directory. Mention that these test cases cover various aspects of garbage collection, including loop optimizations, function inlining, and memory management. 

Analysis of Selected Test Cases

1. loop-1.c
/* Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation.

Simplified from gcc/fold-const.c
by Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> */

/* { dg-do compile } */

void
mul_double ()
{
int i, j, *prod;

for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
{
for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
{
*prod = 0;
}
}
}

This test case is designed to evaluate loop optimization in GCC. It contains nested loops with a simple assignment statement inside. However, there's a critical issue: the prod pointer is dereferenced without being initialized, leading to undefined behavior. Despite this, the primary focus here is likely on loop unrolling or elimination optimization strategies. By observing the generated assembly or intermediate representation (IR), developers can verify if GCC optimizes the loop structure efficiently or if it fails to handle the uninitialized pointer gracefully.

2. loop-2.c
/* PR optimization/10171 */
/* Bug: unroll_loop misoptimized the function so that we got
0 iterations of the loop rather than the correct 1. */
/* { dg-do run } */

extern void abort (void);
extern void exit (int);

__inline__ int tag() { return 0; }

void f ();

int main() {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < (tag() ? 2 : 1); i++)
f();
abort ();
}

void f ()
{
exit (0);
}

In this test case, the focus shifts to loop termination conditions and inlining behavior. The tag() function's return value influences the loop's iteration count, with a condition that should result in one or two iterations. The bug addressed here indicates a misoptimization where GCC wrongly deduces that the loop can be entirely eliminated due to constant folding. By forcing the loop to run at least once, the test ensures that GCC respects the loop's semantics and does not over-aggressively optimize it away.

3.loop-3.c
/* PR optimization/13985 */
/* Copied from gcc.c-torture/compile/930621-1.c */

/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
/* { dg-options "-O3 -mtune=i386" { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && ia32 } } } */
/* { dg-add-options stack_size } */

#if defined(STACK_SIZE) && (STACK_SIZE < 65536)
# define BYTEMEM_SIZE 10000L
#endif

#ifndef BYTEMEM_SIZE
# define BYTEMEM_SIZE 45000L
#endif

int bytestart[5000 + 1];
unsigned char modtext[400 + 1];
unsigned char bytemem[2][BYTEMEM_SIZE + 1];

long
modlookup (int l)
{
signed char c;
long j;
long k;
signed char w;
long p;
while (p != 0)
{
while ((k < bytestart[p + 2]) && (j <= l) && (modtext[j] == bytemem[w][k]))
{
k = k + 1;
j = j + 1;
}
if (k == bytestart[p + 2])
if (j > l)
c = 1;
else c = 4;
else if (j > l)
c = 3;
else if (modtext[j] < bytemem[w][k])
c = 0;
else c = 2;
}
}

This test case is more complex and delves into optimizing code size and performance with aggressive compiler flags like -O3. It also includes target-specific optimizations for the i386 architecture. Additionally, it tests GCC's ability to handle large arrays and complex memory access patterns. The presence of stack size directives (# dg-add-options stack_size) suggests a focus on stack usage optimization. By varying optimization levels and target architectures, developers can evaluate GCC's ability to balance code size and performance across different platforms.

Understanding Test Directives

The directives embedded within these test cases serve as instructions to the DejaGnu testing framework on how to execute and evaluate them. They provide metadata and configuration options specific to each test case. For instance:

dg-do specifies the actions to perform, such as compilation (compile) or execution (run).
dg-options defines additional compiler flags or options to apply during testing, like optimization levels (-O3) or architecture-specific settings.
dg-add-options allows for conditional inclusion of options based on specific criteria, such as target architecture or feature support.
These directives streamline the testing process by automating the execution of test cases under various conditions, ensuring comprehensive coverage of GCC's functionality and behavior.

Conclusion

The analysis of GCC garbage collection test cases underscores the meticulous approach taken by compiler developers to validate the correctness, performance, and optimization capabilities of GCC. Through these test cases, developers can identify and rectify issues, refine optimization algorithms, and enhance the overall reliability of the compiler. By leveraging the power of DejaGnu and carefully crafted test cases, GCC maintains its status as a robust and high-performance compiler suite, indispensable for software development across diverse platforms and architectures.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

PROJECT STAGE 1

Getting started:  -Obtain the source code for the current development version of GCC from the Git repository. git clone git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git  cd gcc   - To build GCC outside of the source tree to keep things clean, build directory was created by following command: mkdir build Configure the build for each of two environments. It sets up the build to create a compiler. -Build GCC. Run make to start the compilation process. Task 1  Prune Cloned Functions (a) Specific, Relevant Sections of the GCC Code Base The relevant sections of the GCC codebase to prune cloned functions can be found in the files where function versioning and cloning are handled. This includes: gcc/function.c for managing functions. gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c for configuring AArch64. gcc/tree-vect-loop.c, or similar files, for vectorization and cloning logic. (b) Work Detail It is involved in the identification of cloned functions in AFMV, which do not offer enough improvements in performan...
Read more

64-Bit Assembly Language Lab

After successfully setting up the servers, namely  AArch64 and x86_64.   Step 1 involved reviewing AArch64 assembly code, including examining the code with objdump to understand the correspondence between source code and machine instructions Step 2 introduced a basic loop structure in AArch64 assembly, looping from 0 to 9 using register x19 as the index counter. The code provided a skeleton loop structure but did not perform any meaningful actions within the loop. .text .globl _start min = 0 /* starting value for the loop index; **note that this is a symbol (constant)**, not a variable */ max = 10 /* loop exits when the index hits this number (loop condition is i<max) */ _start: mov x19, min loop: /* ... body of the loop ... do something useful here ... */ add x19, x19, 1 cmp x19, max b.ne loop mov x0, 0 /* status -> 0 */ mov x8, 93 /* ...
Read more

Assembly language code lab 2

Image
  Lab 2 adding calculator  About:  The Adding Calculator program is designed for a computer system with specific memory locations and routines. The program prompts the user to enter two decimal numbers, performs addition, and displays the sum. Code: ; Adding Calculator ; ROM routine entry points define SCINIT $ff81 ; initialize/clear screen define CHRIN $ffcf ; input character from keyboard define CHROUT $ffd2 ; output character to screen ; zeropage variables define PRINT_PTR $10 define PRINT_PTR_H $11 define firstInput $14 define secInput $15 ; absolute variables define GETNUM_1 $0080 define GETNUM_2 $0081 define ENTER $0d ; for the ENTER key define BACKSPACE $08 ; for the BACKSPACE key ; -------------------------------------------------------- ; Main loop jsr SCINIT ; initialize/clean screen main: ; get first input' ldy #$00 jsr firstIn...
Read more